« The Friday Shuffle: Alas for You, Boobie Scarves. You're Done. Edition | Main | In Which I Continue My Transformation Into a Farmwife, Circa 1932 »

August 18, 2006

Friday Shuffle - The Don't You Have Something Better to Read Edition

I'll be completely honest - I'm going through a bit of disillusion. If I were to dig through my archives, which I won't, I'd probably find that similar disillusions have happened at the end of August every year. That's when I always develop The Late-Summer World-Hating Malaise, a condition that leaves me making such ridiculous remarks as, "Good grief, can't you people comment? *snort* Voyeurs."

By then end of summer, I'm always a tad bit edgy, and really not fit for human interaction or consumption. I'll be fine by mid-September, but for now, be warned: I might greet you with a friendly wave. I might burst into tears. Or I might throw a rock at you. None of these actions are rooted in how I feel about you as a human being. It's simply an artifact of me being perpetually tired, irritated, and fed the hell up.

That's the case during a normal summer. This has not been a normal summer. This has been the Heat Wave Summer. The Anxiety Attack Summer. The Blackout Summer. The Terrible Twos Summer. Considering that, you'd probably be best to assume that the friendly wave isn't my greeting of choice these days.

I'm also prone to incoherant rambling best suited for manifestos written in wooded shacks, but I think you've probably realized that by now.

Every time I've sat down with intentions of blogging this week, all that's come to mind is a long-winded list titled Crap I Currently Hate. Trust me, you don't want to read about how much I hate stupid raging ego t-shirts, triple-digit heat indeses, and Moveable Type eating a blog entry written completely in the style of Alyssa Capucilli's Biscuit books.

So, I'm going the opposite direction. I'm going to blog about something I love. I'm going to blog about reading.

My parents are neighbors with a retired couple who are two of the most voracious readers I've ever met. And that's saying something, because I know a lot of voracious readers. While they're very budget-minded, they do have one extravagance: magazines. The wife confessed to my mom that they spend over $1000 a year in magazine subscriptions. Can you imagine?

Lucky for us, they share the wealth, always passing on the magazines when they're finished. They regularly show up with big boxes of current magazines for my mom. She reads what she wants, then passes the boxes along to me.

Anyone need some magazines? No, seriously. I've got about 948 magazines on my dining room table.

I used to be a magazine junkie, back in high school when I intended to pursue a career in magazine journalism. I've gotten over that over the years, seeing magazines as little more than wastes of paper covered with advertisements. Like, the proliferation of magazines about shopping? What the hell? Isn't that like spending $5 for nothing but advertisements? I don't get that at all.

Thanks to the neighbor, I'm becoming a junkie again. At least I'm recycling, though. Southern Living! Midwest Living! Cottage Living! Country Living! This is living! I'm reading them all, along with whatever else I dig out of the box. I even read an issue of that new Rachael Ray magazine, and I hate Rachael Ray.

My favorite, I almost hate to admit, is the Oprah magazine. It's surprisingly good with a lot of well-written essays. This week I read an interview with Paul Rusesabagina that had me sobbing. I'm currently reading the July issue, which was all about reading. That's the issue with the ballyhoo'd Harper Lee letter.

I'm getting a lot of magazine-reading time these days, because Clara Jane's potty training. And by "potty training" I mean "sitting on the toilet for three one-hour sessions every day". She doesn't have much use for me, as this is what she's doing during these sessions:

Read faster, Clara Jane.

Obviously, I can't leave her alone, because she needs someone to hand the books to her every five minutes when they slide off her lap. But she's so engrossed in her reading that she doesn't care to converse with me. So, I sit on the step-stool she uses to reach the sink, and I plow through the boxes of magazines.

I started the reading issue of the Oprah magazine on Wednesday, when Clara Jane was balancing that entire library on her lap. The timing couldn't be better. I was reading a piece titled "Shelf Awareness", which asked several well-known writers how they manage their book collections.

I'm not a book collector. As much as I love to read, I can't concentrate if I feel like I'm drowning in clutter. More books equals more clutter equals less reading, for me. I rarely even buy books anymore. I stopped because we have access to two excellent library systems. If I'm not dishing out money for books, I can be more free with what I read, more apt to venture into books that go beyond the stuff I know I'll like. But in my book-buying days, I rarely held on to books. I'm a book-lender, and I never expect to see my books again. I don't want to see them again. I like the feeling of setting them free.

The article mentioned that Steve Almond was the only author interviewed who still uses the library. "The important thing is to keep the book in your mind, not on your property." I like that. And even though it cuts into his bottom-line, I hope he doesn't mind that I borrowed Candyfreak and My Life in Heavy Metal from the library when I read them last year.

As a writer, it's probably really bad financial karma for me to either buy all of my books used, or borrow them from the library. Answer me this: in these days of the music and movie industries losing their shit over file-sharing, why is it still not only okay, but accepted for written arts to be borrowed? And not just borrowed, but borrowed from institutions that are taxpayer-funded? Not that I have a problem with this, obviously. It just strikes me as odd.

Anyway, I was reading this article, thinking about my book-keeping habits. And then I looked at my daughter with nine books piled on her tiny lap, and another in her hands. For well over half an hour, she kept her little legs stretched with her feet up to keep them balanced, whining when any of them slid to the floor.

It seems that while my daughter is following in my book lust footsteps, our storage styles are going to be vastly different. She has a new bookcase in her room. A few weeks ago I gathered the piles and piles of her books from around the house and arranged them in the case. I threw some big, comfy pillows on the floor, thinking that she'd love to have her own little reading nook. And she does love it - she loves to sit there and admire the spines of her books, but she won't remove them from the case.

Not only have I created a book-reader, I think I've created a book-hoarder.

Clara Jane begs to go to the library. Not that she has to beg too hard; I take her twice a week at the bare minimum. B. often takes her in the evenings, too. We have two branches we go to so often that most of the librarians know us by name. They also turn a blind eye to our fines and overdue books, and we love them for that. We go to storytime at least once a week. The other trips are just for browsing. She has her routine: she browses the shelves on her eye level and brings books to me one at a time. I'll read the book to her, then she places it on the cart to be reshelved. Repeat. She could do this all day, every day. I can't recall a single instance where Clara Jane asked to leave the library. More often than not, we have to drag her out. Crying is often involved.

She's getting selective about what books she checks out. On Monday, we made a quick stop at the library, only long enough to read four books. When it was time to leave, she pulled one book from the pile we'd read to take home. I didn't have to suggest, ask, or insist. She knew which one she wanted.

For the record, it was "Otto Goes to School" by Todd Parr. Not that this surprised me. When we arrived at the library she told me, "I want to read an Otto book". And who could blame her? The Otto books are great stuff. This one made me cry when we read it at the library a few weeks ago.

Clara Jane's love of books and reading makes me so proud and happy. I may lack a lot of things as a mother. I may let her watch a little too much TV and eat a few too many tortilla chips. I may be a bit too impatient with her, especially as we enter the second hour of Pottyrama. But if I've done anything right, it's that I seem to be doing a good job of raising a reader.

The entire Harper Lee letter should be read by every reader, but there was one part that really struck me:

Now, 75 years later in an abundant society where people have laptops, cellphones, iPods, and minds like empty rooms, I still plod along with books. Instant information is not for me. I prefer to search library stacks because when I work to learn something, I remember it.

Maybe that's the real reason why I've been unmotivated to blog, or even read anyone else's blog this week. It's too easy and therefore not as fulfilling as, say, plodding through 528 pages of The Whole World Over. Right now, I'm craving that fulfillment.

But that doesn't mean that I'm throwing the iPod away. I'll shuffle between chapters and potty breaks.

1. Hello Mr. Heartache - Dixie Chicks
2. Loose Translation - The New Pornographers
3. Linstead Market - Dan Zanes
4. I Got Love if You Want It - Slim Harpo
5. This Love Affair - Rufus Wainwright
6. The Swimmer - Sleater-Kinney (which has shuffled up roughly 26 times this week; must be time for a reset)
7. I Want a Little Sugar in My Bowl - Nina Simone
8. Supposed to Be - Jack Johnson
9. It Ain't Supposed to Be - Exene Cervenka & the Original Sinners (For the record, I'd pay good money to see Exene and Jack in a cage match, fighting over whether it's supposed to be or not supposed to be. My money's on Exene smashing a surfboard over his head.)
10. Disco Blackout - ControllerController

Posted by Robin at August 18, 2006 04:01 PM

Comments

Working in a public library, I've been saddened by so many parents that just get their kids videos and dvds, by the bagful even! It makes me sick, especially when there's not one book. I hate it. But there are just as many kids who dig books and storytimes and I think it's the coolest thing ever.

Ever since I was little, I tended to read two or three things at once, because even though it's awesome to get into a great new book, it's even better to get into multiple books at once! And trade-off reading them! Yeah, I'm a dork. But it lead me to a love of school and research (even though I get frustrated, I still love school).

Anyway, back to you and Clara Jane. As soon as I see one photo and declare it to be the cutest thing ever, another one promptly takes it's place!
And I'm proud of you for raising a voracious reader, one who knows how awesome libraries are.
But then again, I wouldn't have expected anything less from you :)

Posted by: Blossom's Dad's Ho at August 18, 2006 09:37 PM

What BDH said about cutest pic ever. That one needs to be framed.

August is a blah month. My art group does a (large) exchange and we have a little artful gift to open each day.

Actually, I'd like to hear about why you hate "stupid raging ego t-shirts," as they tend to amuse me, especially when seeing who is wearing them. But I'm weird that way. And I like the faux-old ones, too, but that's mostly because of leftover childhood wants--e.g. I never had a SpeedRacer tshirt as a child despite that I was gonna marry him. If they made stuff like that then, either it wasn't available or I wasn't allowed or it was only available in Japan or some such.

Posted by: Jane at August 19, 2006 07:42 AM

That really is a great picture.

I love that I'm a reader. I take comfort in the idea that as long as I have something to read I'll never be bored.

When the clampdown on what could be carried on an airplane started a couple weeks ago I freaked at the idea of not being able to take a book on the plane. No knitting? Okay. No iPod? I'm still functional. No book? Just knock me out and wake me up ten hours later when the plane lands.

I love magazines too. One of the things I miss is being able to get magazines. I dislike reading in German so I don't enjoy magazines anymore.

Posted by: Dixie at August 20, 2006 05:13 PM

Holy crap, there are enough different magazines to spend $1000 smackers on them a year? Ummm wow! Now that's a cute picture! LOL!

Posted by: Sassy at August 21, 2006 12:54 AM

We have been feeling the end of summer malaise as well and are dealing with our hermit-like existence with books too.

Thanks for the picture. It's adorable

P.S. Potty training is going about the same for us

Posted by: Michelle at August 21, 2006 08:29 AM

Malaise....yargh.

Posted by: Summer at August 21, 2006 08:48 AM

Kristina, I've never been able to read multiple books at the same time. I keep trying, but I just can't balance them. I'm reading two right now, because they're both library books with long waiting lists and I can't renew. One of them is over 500 pages and I'm in a panic.

Jane, the primary reason why I hate those shirts is because most of the time, they're not worn with one bit of irony, and that makes me sad. I especially hate it when little kids are dressed in such shirts. When I was little, I had a nickname I hated, which mocked my talkativeness. For some gift-giving occasion when I was in first grade, my parents had a t-shirt made for me with that name on it. It broke my heart. I felt like they were putting what they thought was one of my flaws on display. All too "Scarlet Letter"ish. Bottom line: I think any shirts of that nature, worn by adults or foisted onto kids by adults, advertises not-so-great aspects of their personalities, thus putting more negativity into the world.

Dammit, Dixie. There was an article in one of the magazines I Freecycled last weekend that I meant to send to you, but figured you'd already read it. It's from an issue of the Oprah magazine from earlier this year, I forget which one. It's about the emotional aspects of caretaking. I'll see if I can find it from the library and send you a copy. For whatever reason it didn't occur to me that your access to English-language magazines might be that limited.

Posted by: Robin at August 23, 2006 09:41 AM